Notes

1 Most recently and prominently, attempts have been made to examine how ‘feelings’ are generated socially and in dialogue with the world through studies of affect (Ahmed 2004; Stewart 2007). Previous scholars who embraced the ‘edgier’ elements of emotion and experience include Rosaldo (1980), Obeyesekere (1981), and Jackson (1996).

2 Until the end of the Congo civil wars and the turn of the twenty-first century, there was only one long-term and productive bonobo field site. Two others had been completely abandoned during the wars. There are now five sites, compared with over 20 chimpanzee field sites, several of which have been running since the 1960s.

3 To appear more botanical, many forgo the symmetrical nature of animal bodies and have a missing internal organ. Their bodies may have ridges resembling leaf veins, bark-like tubercles, and other forms of camouflage, such as mossy or lichenous outgrowths.

4 A collection of anthropological works on dreaming, some of which draw on psychoanalysis or cognitive science, can be found in Bulkeley et al. (2016).

5 Stasch (2008) explores the ways in which the southeastern West Papua Korowai people similarly sometimes appear to be ‘other to themselves’.

6 Feminist STS has challenged the alluring myth of objectivity and perspectivalism (Haraway 1988; Mol 2002). Furthermore, critical scholars of the animal sciences, such as Crist (2010), Despret (2014), and Milton (2005), have challenged mechanistic reasoning and suggested ‘egomorphism’ as a method for understanding animal selves.

References

Ahmed, S., ‘Affective Economies’, Social Text, 22.2 (2004): 117–139.

Alcayna-Stevens, L., ‘Habituating Field Scientists’, Social Studies of Science, 46.6 (2016): 833–853.

Barad, K., Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007).

Berlant, L., ‘Slow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency)’, Critical Inquiry, 33.4 (2007): 754–780.

Bourdieu, P., Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Bulkeley, K., ed., Dreams: A Reader on Religious, Cultural and Psychological Dimensions of Dreaming (New York: Springer, 2016).

Chen, M. Y., ‘Toxic Animacies, Inanimate Affections’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17.2–3 (2011): 265–286.

Crist, E., Images of Animals (Pennsylvania, PA: Temple University Press, 2010).

Das, V., ‘Language and Body: Transactions in the Construction of Pain’, Daedalus, 125.1 (1996): 67–91.

De la Cadena, M., ‘Runa: Human but not only’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4.2 (2014): 253–259.

Despret, V., ‘The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis’, Body & Society, 10.2–3 (2004): 111–134.

——, ‘Responding Bodies and Partial Affinities in Human–Animal Worlds’, Theory, Culture & Society, 30.7–8 (2013): 51–76.

Galinier, J., and others, ‘Anthropology of the Night: Cross-Disciplinary Investigations’, Current Anthropology, 51.6 (2010): 839.

Giddens, A., The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

Haraway, D., ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14.3 (1988): 575–599.

——, When Species Meet (University of Minnesota Press, 2013).

——, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016).

Henke, C., and T. Gieryn, ‘Sites of Scientific Practice: The Enduring Importance of Place’, in E. Hackett and others, eds., New Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008).

Howes, D., Empire of the Senses (Oxford, UK: Berg, 2005).

Jackson, M., ed., Things As They Are: New Directions in Phenomenological Anthropology (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1996).

Jones, C. A., ed., Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006).

Kaplan A., ‘Looking for the Other: Feminist, Film and the Imperial’, Film Quarterly, 52.3 (1999): 57–58.

Kohn, E., How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2013).

——, ‘Further Thoughts on Sylvan Thinking’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4.2 (2014): 275–288.

Milton, K., ‘Anthropomorphism or Egomorphism? The Perception of Non-Human Persons by Human Ones’, in J. Knight, ed., Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Intimacy (Oxford: Berg, 2005): pp. 255–271.

Mol, A., The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002).

Myers, N., Rendering Life Molecular: Models, Modelers, and Excitable Matter (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015).

Myers, N., and J. Dumit, ‘Haptic Creativity and the Mid-Embodiments of Experimental Life’, in F. E. Mascia-Lees, ed., A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2011), pp. 239–261.

Obeyesekere, G., ‘An Essay on Personal Symbols and Religious Experience’, in M. Lambek, ed., A Reader in the Anthropology of Religion (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 1981), pp. 383–397.

Povinelli, E. A., Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011).

Rosaldo, M. Z., Knowledge and Passion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).

Said, E., Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979).

Stasch, R., Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place (Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2009).

Stewart, K., Ordinary Affects (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007).

——, ‘Regionality’, Geographical Review, 103.2 (2013): 275–284.

Walford, A., ‘Double Standards: Examples and Exceptions in Scientific Metrological Practices in Brazil’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21.S1 (2015): 64–77.

Wacquant, L., ‘Homines in Extremis: What Fighting Scholars Teach Us about Habitus’, Body & Society, 20.2 (2014): 3–17.

Waterton, C., and K. Yusoff, ‘Indeterminate Bodies: Introduction’, Body & Society, 23.3 (2017): 3–22.

Yusoff, K., ‘Insensible Worlds: Postrelational Ethics, Indeterminacy and the (K) Nots of Relating’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31.2 (2013): 208–226.