1 The authors conducted two graduate student workshops, one at the ETHOS Lab, ITU University of Copenhagen in September 2018, and one at the Munich Center for Technology in Society, Technical University Munich in January 2019. We would like to thank all participants for sharing and rethinking their work with us.
2 See also the Visual Vignettes in the STS Infrastructures exhibition, by clicking “on ‘Artifacts’ and their respective ‘Annotations’” https://stsinfrastructures.org/content/visual-vignettes-0 [accessed 21 September 2019].
Ballestero, A. and Winthereik, B. (Eds) (forthcoming). Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bauer, S., Schlünder, M., and M. Rentetzi (Eds) (2020). Boxes – A Field Guide Manchester: Mattering Press.
Beuving, J. (2017). Contacts in a Box: Cell Phones, Social Relations and Field Research in Africa. African Studies 78(3): 370–384.
Boudreault-Fournier, A. (2016). Recording and Editing. In D. Elliott, and D. Culhane (Eds), A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 69–90.
Cage, J. (1967). A Year from Monday: New Lectures and Writings by John Cage. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
Chio, J. (2017). Guiding Lines. Cultural Anthropology. Blog <https://culanth.org/fieldsights/guiding-lines> [accessed 18 September 2019], 2 May.
Clifford, J., and Marcus G. E. (Eds) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Colleex – Collaboratory for Ethnographic Experiements. Original #colleex manifesto. <https://colleex.wordpress.com/about/colleex-manifesto/> [accessed 30 March 2021].
Collins, S. G., and Durington, M. S. (2015). Networked Anthropology: A Primer for Ethnographers. New York: Routledge.
Collins, S. G., Durington, M., and Gill, H. (2017). Multimodality: An Invitation: Multimodal Anthropologies. American Anthropologist 119(1): 142–146.
Cooper, M. (2008). Sharing Data and Results with Study Participants: Report on a Survey of Cultural Anthropologists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3(4): 19–34.
Dányi, E., Suchman, L., and Watts, L. (2021). Relocating Innovation: Postcards from Three Edges. In A. Ballestero, and B. R. Winthereik (Eds), Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Dattatreyan, E. G., and Marrero-Guillamón, I. (2019). Introduction: Multimodal anthropology and the politics of invention: Multimodal anthropologies. American Anthropologist 121(1): 220–228.
Douglas-Jones, R., and Cohn, M. (2018). GDPR: Erasure Poems. ETHOSLab, IT University of Copenhagen.
Downey, G.L., and Zuiderent-Jerak, T. (2017). Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr (Eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 223–251.
Dumit, J. (2017). Game Design as STS Research. Engaging Science, Technology and Society 3 (2017): 603–612.
Elliott, D., and Culhane, D. (Eds) (2017). A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Estalella, A., and Criado, T. S. (Eds) (2018). Experimental Collaborations: Ethnography Through Devices. New York: Berghahn Books.
Favero, P. (2017). Tainted Frictions: A Visual Essay. American Anthropologist 119(2): 361–364.
Favero, P. S. H., and Theunissen, E. (2018). With the Smartphone as Field Assistant: Designing, Making and Testing EthnoAlly, a Multimodal tool for Conducting Serendipitous Ethnography in a Multisensory World. American Anthropologist. Multimodal Anthropologies, 21 February. <http://www.americananthropologist.org/2018/02/21/with-the-smartphone-as-field-assistant-designing-making-and-testing-ethnoally-a-multimodal-tool-for-conducting-serendipitous-ethnography-in-a-multisensory-world/> [accessed 18 September 2019].
Färber, A. (2007). Exposing Expo: Exhibition Entrepreneurship and Experimental Reflexivity in Late Modernity. In S. MacDonald and P. Basu (Eds), Exhibition Experiments. London: Wiley.
Fochler, M., and de Rijcke, S. (2017). Implicated in the Indicator Game? An Experimental Debate. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 21–40.
Gabrys, J. (2019). Sensors and Sensing Practice: Reworking Experience across Entities, Environments and Technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values 44(5): 723–736.
Gugganig, M. (2011). hidden practices. <https://vimeo.com/24065752> [accessed 1 October 2019], 7 min.
—— (2015). Making Dust Come to Matter: The Scaffolding of Academia. Visual Essay for Wenner-Gren Workshop ‘Hope and Insufficiency: Capacity Building in Ethnographic Comparison’. <https://hopeandinsufficiency.wordpress.com/visual-essay-competition/mascha-gugganig/> [accessed 1 October 2019].
—— (2019). Exploring Education at a Hawaiian-Focused Charter School, a Food Sovereignty Movement, and the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry. Visual vignette https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/exploring-education-by-mascha-gugganig/ [accessed 24 March 2020].
Gugganig, M., and Schor, S. (2020a). Teaching (with) Postcards: Approaches in the Classroom, the Field, and the Community. Teaching Anthropology 9(2): 56–65.
—— (2020b). Multimodal Ethnography in/of/as Postcards. American Anthropologist 122(3): 691-697.
Howe, S. (2014). A Note About Two Systems. Law Culture Text 18: 249–257.
Hyysalo, S., Pollock, N., and Williams, R. A. (2019). Method Matters in the Social Study of Technology: Investigating Biographies of Artifacts and Practices. Science & Technology Studies 32(3): 1–25.
Jungnickel, K. (Ed.) (2020). Transmissions: Critical Tactics for Making and Communicating Research. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kuen, L. (2019). The Freedom of the Forest. Visual vignette. <https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/the-freedom-of-the-forest-by-laura-kuen-2/> [accessed 26 March 2020].
Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 327–343.
Latour, B. (1988). The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London; Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 155–176.
Law, J. (2007). Pinboards and Books: Learning, Materiality and Juxtaposition. In D. Kritt, and L. T. Winegar (Eds), Education and Technology: Critical Perspectives, Possible Futures. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 125–150.
Le Bot, J., and Noel, M. (2016). ‘Making and Doing’ at 4s Meeting (Denver): Let’s Extend the Experiment! EASST Review 35(1). <https://easst.net/article/making-and-doing-at-4s-meeting-denver-lets-extend-the-experiment/> [accessed 24 March 2020].
Liboiron, M., Ammendolia, J., and Winsor, K., et al. (2017). Equity in Author Order: A Feminist Laboratory’s Approach. Catalyst 3(2): 1–17.
Lippert, I., and Douglas-Jones, R. (2019). ‘Doing Data’: Methodography in and of STS. EASST Review 38(1). <https://easst.net/article/doing-data-methodography-in-and-of-sts/#_ftn1> [accessed 8 October 2019].
Lury, C., and Wakeford, N. (Eds) (2012). Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Oxford; New York: Routledge.
Marcus, G. E., and Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). A Crisis of Representation in the Human Sciences. In Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–16.
Mattern, S. (2016). Cloud and Field. Places Journal. <https://doi.org/10.22269/160802> [accessed 14 May 2020].
Pandian, A., and McLean, S. J. (Eds) (2017). Crumpled Paper Boat: Experiments in Ethnographic Writing. Durham: Duke University Press.
Paper Boat Collective (2017). Introduction: Archipelagos, A Voyage in Writing. In A. Pandian, and S. J. McLean (Eds), Crumpled Paper Boat: Experiments in Ethnographic Writing. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 11–28.
Pink, S. (2011). Multimodality, Multisensoriality and Ethnographic Knowing: Social Semiotics and the Phenomenology of Perception. Qualitative Research 11(3): 261–276.
Rose, G., and Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (Eds) (2012). Visuality/Materiality: Images, Objects and Practices. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
Ruby, J. (2000). Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rueß, A. (2019). Public Image(s)? – Two Tales of a Nuclear Mono-Culture. Visual vignette. <https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/public-images-two-tales-of-a-nuclear-mono-culture-by-anja-rues/> [accessed 26 March 2020].
Sanjek, R., and Tratner, S. (Eds) (2015). eFieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology in the Digital World. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schrader, A. (2010). Responding to Pfisteria Piscicida (the Fish Killer): Phantomatic Ontologies, Indeterminacy, and Responsibility in Toxic Microbiology. Social Studies of Science 40(2): 275–306.
Star, S. L. (Ed.) (1995). Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
—— (2002). Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice: Working on the Fringes. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(2): 107–122.
Stone, R. (2017). The Trump-Era Boom in Erasure Poetry: How a Poetic Form Gained New Political Purpose Online in 2017. The New Republic, 23 October.
Strathern, M. (2006). Bullet-Proofing: A Tale from the United Kingdom. In A. Riles (Ed.), Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.
STS Infrastructures (2019). Special Exhibit by the Society for the Social Studies of Science. <https://stsinfrastructures.org/> [accessed 1 October 2019].
Tufte, E. (2003). The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Visual vignettes (2018). Blog. <https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/> [accessed 1 October 2019].
Watts, L. (2020). This is Not a Poem, This is STS. STS Problems Roundtable, Does STS Have Problems. 4S-EASST Barcelona. https://stsproblems.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/this-is-not-a-poem/ [accessed 15 May 2020].
Watts, L. (2017). The Draukie’s Tale. In I. Szeman, and D. Boyer (Eds), Energy Humanities: An Anthology. Johns Hopkins University Press.