Notes

References

Ballestero, A. and Winthereik, B. (Eds) (forthcoming). Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bauer, S., Schlünder, M., and M. Rentetzi (Eds) (2020). Boxes – A Field Guide Manchester: Mattering Press.

Beuving, J. (2017). Contacts in a Box: Cell Phones, Social Relations and Field Research in Africa. African Studies 78(3): 370–384.

Boudreault-Fournier, A. (2016). Recording and Editing. In D. Elliott, and D. Culhane (Eds), A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 69–90.

Cage, J. (1967). A Year from Monday: New Lectures and Writings by John Cage. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

Chio, J. (2017). Guiding Lines. Cultural Anthropology. Blog <https://culanth.org/fieldsights/guiding-lines> [accessed 18 September 2019], 2 May.

Clifford, J., and Marcus G. E. (Eds) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Colleex – Collaboratory for Ethnographic Experiements. Original #colleex manifesto. <https://colleex.wordpress.com/about/colleex-manifesto/> [accessed 30 March 2021].

Collins, S. G., and Durington, M. S. (2015). Networked Anthropology: A Primer for Ethnographers. New York: Routledge.

Collins, S. G., Durington, M., and Gill, H. (2017). Multimodality: An Invitation: Multimodal Anthropologies. American Anthropologist 119(1): 142–146.

Cooper, M. (2008). Sharing Data and Results with Study Participants: Report on a Survey of Cultural Anthropologists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3(4): 19–34.

Dányi, E., Suchman, L., and Watts, L. (2021). Relocating Innovation: Postcards from Three Edges. In A. Ballestero, and B. R. Winthereik (Eds), Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

Dattatreyan, E. G., and Marrero-Guillamón, I. (2019). Introduction: Multimodal anthropology and the politics of invention: Multimodal anthropologies. American Anthropologist 121(1): 220–228.

Douglas-Jones, R., and Cohn, M. (2018). GDPR: Erasure Poems. ETHOSLab, IT University of Copenhagen.

Downey, G.L., and Zuiderent-Jerak, T. (2017). Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr (Eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 223–251.

Dumit, J. (2017). Game Design as STS Research. Engaging Science, Technology and Society 3 (2017): 603–612.

Elliott, D., and Culhane, D. (Eds) (2017). A Different Kind of Ethnography: Imaginative Practices and Creative Methodologies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Estalella, A., and Criado, T. S. (Eds) (2018). Experimental Collaborations: Ethnography Through Devices. New York: Berghahn Books.

Favero, P. (2017). Tainted Frictions: A Visual Essay. American Anthropologist 119(2): 361–364.

Favero, P. S. H., and Theunissen, E. (2018). With the Smartphone as Field Assistant: Designing, Making and Testing EthnoAlly, a Multimodal tool for Conducting Serendipitous Ethnography in a Multisensory World. American Anthropologist. Multimodal Anthropologies, 21 February. <http://www.americananthropologist.org/2018/02/21/with-the-smartphone-as-field-assistant-designing-making-and-testing-ethnoally-a-multimodal-tool-for-conducting-serendipitous-ethnography-in-a-multisensory-world/> [accessed 18 September 2019].

Färber, A. (2007). Exposing Expo: Exhibition Entrepreneurship and Experimental Reflexivity in Late Modernity. In S. MacDonald and P. Basu (Eds), Exhibition Experiments. London: Wiley.

Fochler, M., and de Rijcke, S. (2017). Implicated in the Indicator Game? An Experimental Debate. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3: 21–40.

Gabrys, J. (2019). Sensors and Sensing Practice: Reworking Experience across Entities, Environments and Technologies. Science, Technology and Human Values 44(5): 723–736.

Gugganig, M. (2011). hidden practices. <https://vimeo.com/24065752> [accessed 1 October 2019], 7 min.

—— (2015). Making Dust Come to Matter: The Scaffolding of Academia. Visual Essay for Wenner-Gren Workshop ‘Hope and Insufficiency: Capacity Building in Ethnographic Comparison’. <https://hopeandinsufficiency.wordpress.com/visual-essay-competition/mascha-gugganig/> [accessed 1 October 2019].

—— (2019). Exploring Education at a Hawaiian-Focused Charter School, a Food Sovereignty Movement, and the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry. Visual vignette https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/exploring-education-by-mascha-gugganig/ [accessed 24 March 2020].

Gugganig, M., and Schor, S. (2020a). Teaching (with) Postcards: Approaches in the Classroom, the Field, and the Community. Teaching Anthropology 9(2): 56–65.

—— (2020b). Multimodal Ethnography in/of/as Postcards. American Anthropologist 122(3): 691-697.

Howe, S. (2014). A Note About Two Systems. Law Culture Text 18: 249–257.

Hyysalo, S., Pollock, N., and Williams, R. A. (2019). Method Matters in the Social Study of Technology: Investigating Biographies of Artifacts and Practices. Science & Technology Studies 32(3): 1–25.

Jungnickel, K. (Ed.) (2020). Transmissions: Critical Tactics for Making and Communicating Research. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Kuen, L. (2019). The Freedom of the Forest. Visual vignette. <https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/the-freedom-of-the-forest-by-laura-kuen-2/> [accessed 26 March 2020].

Larkin, B. (2013). The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology 42: 327–343.

Latour, B. (1988). The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London; Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 155–176.

Law, J. (2007). Pinboards and Books: Learning, Materiality and Juxtaposition. In D. Kritt, and L. T. Winegar (Eds), Education and Technology: Critical Perspectives, Possible Futures. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 125–150.

Le Bot, J., and Noel, M. (2016). ‘Making and Doing’ at 4s Meeting (Denver): Let’s Extend the Experiment! EASST Review 35(1). <https://easst.net/article/making-and-doing-at-4s-meeting-denver-lets-extend-the-experiment/> [accessed 24 March 2020].

Liboiron, M., Ammendolia, J., and Winsor, K., et al. (2017). Equity in Author Order: A Feminist Laboratory’s Approach. Catalyst 3(2): 1–17.

Lippert, I., and Douglas-Jones, R. (2019). ‘Doing Data’: Methodography in and of STS. EASST Review 38(1). <https://easst.net/article/doing-data-methodography-in-and-of-sts/#_ftn1> [accessed 8 October 2019].

Lury, C., and Wakeford, N. (Eds) (2012). Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Oxford; New York: Routledge.

Marcus, G. E., and Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). A Crisis of Representation in the Human Sciences. In Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–16.

Mattern, S. (2016). Cloud and Field. Places Journal. <https://doi.org/10.22269/160802> [accessed 14 May 2020].

Pandian, A., and McLean, S. J. (Eds) (2017). Crumpled Paper Boat: Experiments in Ethnographic Writing. Durham: Duke University Press.

Paper Boat Collective (2017). Introduction: Archipelagos, A Voyage in Writing. In A. Pandian, and S. J. McLean (Eds), Crumpled Paper Boat: Experiments in Ethnographic Writing. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 11–28.

Pink, S. (2011). Multimodality, Multisensoriality and Ethnographic Knowing: Social Semiotics and the Phenomenology of Perception. Qualitative Research 11(3): 261–276.

Rose, G., and Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (Eds) (2012). Visuality/Materiality: Images, Objects and Practices. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.

Ruby, J. (2000). Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rueß, A. (2019). Public Image(s)? – Two Tales of a Nuclear Mono-Culture. Visual vignette. <https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/public-images-two-tales-of-a-nuclear-mono-culture-by-anja-rues/> [accessed 26 March 2020].

Sanjek, R., and Tratner, S. (Eds) (2015). eFieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology in the Digital World. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.

Schrader, A. (2010). Responding to Pfisteria Piscicida (the Fish Killer): Phantomatic Ontologies, Indeterminacy, and Responsibility in Toxic Microbiology. Social Studies of Science 40(2): 275–306.

Star, S. L. (Ed.) (1995). Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

—— (2002). Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice: Working on the Fringes. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(2): 107–122.

Stone, R. (2017). The Trump-Era Boom in Erasure Poetry: How a Poetic Form Gained New Political Purpose Online in 2017. The New Republic, 23 October.

Strathern, M. (2006). Bullet-Proofing: A Tale from the United Kingdom. In A. Riles (Ed.), Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

STS Infrastructures (2019). Special Exhibit by the Society for the Social Studies of Science. <https://stsinfrastructures.org/> [accessed 1 October 2019].

Tufte, E. (2003). The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

Visual vignettes (2018). Blog. <https://visualvignettes.wordpress.com/> [accessed 1 October 2019].

Watts, L. (2020). This is Not a Poem, This is STS. STS Problems Roundtable, Does STS Have Problems. 4S-EASST Barcelona. https://stsproblems.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/this-is-not-a-poem/ [accessed 15 May 2020].

Watts, L. (2017). The Draukie’s Tale. In I. Szeman, and D. Boyer (Eds), Energy Humanities: An Anthology. Johns Hopkins University Press.